A seven-step talk track for a live walkthrough. Every link stays inside sample preview pages except `/workspaces`, and no sales action sends data or starts billing.
Open Workspaces
Open stepZAGOS separates the Full Suite workspace from the Compliance Automation workspace.
Open Product
Open stepZAGOS Compliance Automation is built for enterprise AI, cloud, API, privacy, security, and operational compliance.
Open Demo Command Center
Open stepHere are the four key business scenarios: AI governance, Cloud/API misuse, privacy/security, and supply chain governance.
Open Dashboard
Open stepDashboard gives the compliance posture, findings, evidence completeness, and Cloud/API risk summary.
Open Top Finding
Open stepFindings include severity, affected frameworks, evidence, recommended remediation, and lifecycle actions.
Open Workflow
Open stepWorkflows turn findings into remediation steps.
Open Executive Summary
Open stepExecutive summary gives leadership a clear view of risk, readiness, and next actions.
A clear picture of where your compliance posture stands today across your selected frameworks.
A structured list of evidence references that need attention, with control references and owners.
Prioritised findings with severity, ownership, and due dates so your team knows what to work on first.
A readiness report you can share with leadership. Reports summarise readiness and supporting data — they are not formal audit opinions.
“ZAGOS Compliance Automation gives your team a manual-first, evidence-backed way to move from scattered AI and cloud risk into findings, workflows, and executive reporting. We can start with a focused readiness workshop, map your top frameworks, and identify the first evidence gaps before any connector is enabled.”
We already have spreadsheets.
Spreadsheets can track rows, but they do not create a live evidence-to-finding-to-workflow story. ZAGOS turns the spreadsheet into operational accountability.
We use GRC tools already.
ZAGOS can sit closer to AI, API, cloud, and operational evidence. The value is speed, context, and remediation workflow, not replacing every GRC system on day one.
We are not ready for ISO 42001 yet.
That is exactly when readiness mapping helps. Start with gaps, evidence, and owners before a formal audit is scheduled.
We are worried about connecting cloud accounts.
The demo is manual/sample-only. A buyer can start with manual evidence and review planned connector scopes before any integration exists.
We only need AI governance, not full compliance.
Start with AI governance readiness, then expand when privacy, security, cloud, and supplier evidence become part of the same audit story.
How is this different from Vanta/Drata?
The wedge is AI governance plus Cloud/API Guard: findings tied to AI, API misuse, credential exposure, billing anomalies, and remediation workflow.
Will this call our cloud APIs?
Not in this preview. The current demo performs no cloud, AI, or external API calls. Future connectors should be explicitly reviewed and authorized.
Can we start manually before integrations?
Yes. Manual evidence intake and sample workflows are designed to show a safe manual-first path.